Install this theme
David Foster Wallace vs. Kurt Vonnegut

Kurt Vonnegut, writing in response to Jonathan Franzen’s April Folio on American novelists, “Perchance to Dream,” claims that “Novelists are people who believe they can dampen their neuroses by writing make-believe. We will keep on doing that no matter what, while offering loftier explanations.” This makes Vonnegut look humble and lovable, but as a response to the stuff Franzen was talking about is total horseshit.  If Vonnegut’s sound bite were the whole truth, nobody at all would read novels - who would want to devote hours of brain work to something somebody had written just to dampen his own neuroses?

Good art is a kind of magic. It does magical things for both artist and audience. We can have long polysyllabic arguments about how to describe the way this magic works but the plain fact is that good art is magical and precious and cool. It’s hard to make good art, and it seems to me wholly reasonable that a good artist should be concerned with their work’s cultural reception. I thought it was brave of Franzen to offer not only “lofty explanations” but honest and intimate descriptions of how it feels to try to make good, serious art in a culture that doesn’t seem to value it much. And I was disappointed that the Harper’s Letters editor chose to run only sneery, disparaging letters about the essay. I’ve spoken with way too many readers and writers who admired Franzen’s piece to believe disparaging letters were all that Harper’s got. I suppose one reason it was brave of Franzen to publish his essay is that it made it easy for other writers to look humble and adorable at his expense.

David Foster Wallace, Bloomington, Ill.

I ran across this in the Letters section of an old edition of Harper’s magazine from September 1996. Wallace took offense to a letter Kurt Vonnegut had written regarding an article by Jonathan Franzen.  DFW defended the article.  Now, this took place back in 1996.  Wallace was no where near the heavyweight he became later.  How much sack did he have to write in and absolutely destroy a legend like Vonnegut?  I love this guy.  I love Vonnegut too but, ouch.

 
  1. brandi-jensen reblogged this from robbmonn
  2. strategos reblogged this from printedandbound
  3. littlepinprick reblogged this from printedandbound
  4. transpondster reblogged this from printedandbound and added:
    David Foster Wallace vs. Kurt Vonnegut...Writers, any artists really, have to fight this...
  5. robbmonn reblogged this from printedandbound
  6. thenotes reblogged this from brianmlatimer and added:
    I’m sorry, no, you’re the horseshit. As a writer who dealt exclusively with his own neuroses, both meta-literary and...
  7. mayeeware reblogged this from libraryland
  8. libraryland reblogged this from printedandbound
  9. brianmlatimer reblogged this from printedandbound
  10. shuffstuff reblogged this from printedandbound
  11. sagatrope reblogged this from printedandbound
  12. cartoonfoods reblogged this from printedandbound and added:
    question posed: SO MUCH sack my affections
  13. printedandbound posted this